Your manifest above leaves me a bit confused. Your title juxtaposes Lewis and postmodern, yet the text of your article betrays Lewis as a critic of the modern rather than the post-modern. To surreptitiously define diadic terms (“good and evil, duty and taboo, vice and virtue, etc”), even though the terms you choose don’t even beolong in the same sentence, as “the tao” is just stupid, or maybe lazy or dishonest (depending on how intelligent you actually are).